Friday, September 22, 2006

Blast From The Past

While digging through some old papers I came across this picture.
It was taken in the old Morgan City church building around 1971 - give or take a year or two.
It is of myself and Brother Randy Smith, for all of you young folks who did not know life back in those ancient days.
This was in the time when we both had hair.

Since there is no picture on the wall behind us, it was after the picture was covered.
Since I am playing guitar, it was taken before I chopped off the end of my finger.
I am not sure when that happened.

Did you know Bro. Randy could play bass?

Old timers may get more of a giggle out of this than you youngers.

For you tekkees-
I did not scan this picture, I just put it on my desk and used close-up focus on my digital camera.
I am amazed how well (sharp) it came out.

Monday, September 18, 2006

Death To America - Again?

Last week the Pope made a speech.
In the speech he said the following:

"I was reminded of all this recently, when I read the edition by Professor Theodore Khoury (Münster) of part of the dialogue carried on — perhaps in 1391 in the winter barracks near Ankara — by the erudite Byzantine emperor Manuel II Paleologus and an educated Persian on the subject of Christianity and Islam, and the truth of both. It was presumably the emperor himself who set down this dialogue, during the siege of Constantinople between 1394 and 1402; and this would explain why his arguments are given in greater detail than those of his Persian interlocutor.

The dialogue ranges widely over the structures of faith contained in the Bible and in the Qur'an, and deals especially with the image of God and of man, while necessarily returning repeatedly to the relationship between — as they were called — three "Laws" or "rules of life": the Old Testament, the New Testament and the Qur'an. It is not my intention to discuss this question in the present lecture; here I would like to discuss only one point — itself rather marginal to the dialogue as a whole — which, in the context of the issue of "faith and reason," I found interesting and which can serve as the starting-point for my reflections on this issue.

"In the seventh conversation edited by Professor Khoury, the emperor touches on the theme of the holy war. The emperor must have known that (in the Qur'an) surah 2, 256 reads: "There is no compulsion in religion." According to the experts, this is one of the suras of the early period, when Mohammed was still powerless and under threat. But naturally the emperor also knew the instructions, developed later and recorded in the Qur'an, concerning holy war.

"Without descending to details, such as the difference in treatment accorded to those who have the "Book" and the "infidels," he addresses his interlocutor with a startling brusqueness on the central question about the relationship between religion and violence in general, saying: "Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached."

"The emperor, after having expressed himself so forcefully, goes on to explain in detail the reasons why spreading the faith through violence is something unreasonable. Violence is incompatible with the nature of God and the nature of the soul. "God," he says, "is not pleased by blood — and not acting reasonably is contrary to God's nature. Faith is born of the soul, not the body. Whoever would lead someone to faith needs the ability to speak well and to reason properly, without violence and threats... To convince a reasonable soul, one does not need a strong arm, or weapons of any kind, or any other means of threatening a person with death...."

He ended his lecture with the following statement:

"The courage to engage the whole breadth of reason, and not the denial of its grandeur — this is the program with which a theology grounded in Biblical faith enters into the debates of our time. 'Not to act reasonably, not to act with logos, is contrary to the nature of God,' said Manuel II, according to his Christian understanding of God, in response to his Persian interlocutor. It is to this great logos, to this breadth of reason, that we invite our partners in the dialogue of cultures. To rediscover it constantly is the great task of the university."

The Pope invited the Muslims, other Christians, Jews and scientists to TALK to each other. Islam responded to his invitation by killing Christians, burning churches and the Pope in effigy, which doesn't appear to be a good way to start a dialogue. Now, I ask you, if the Qur'an teaches Muslims that there should be no compulsion in religion, why are they killing nuns, burning down Christian churches and burning the Pope in effigy? Well at a later date Mohammad wrote in sura 9: 29-30 of the Qur'an:

"9.29": Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Apostle have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth, out of those who have been given the Book, until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection.

"9.30": And the Jews say: Uzair is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away! "

End of quote

In typical fashon, Muslim men all over the world poured into the streets with fists in the air, firing guns and waving pre-printed signs saying/shouting "Death to America" and "Death to Israel".

Ho hum.
Another day, another Muslim parade.
New "reason", same script.

So, let me get this straight.
The guy said that the violence of (some) Muslims is "evil and inhuman".
So to protest this statement, many Muslim men all over the world go into the streets and shout,
"Death to America!"
"Death to Israel!"

That should dispel any misconceptions about how they think.

Muslim wife: "I found a bug in the kitchen."
Muslim husband (shouting): "Death to America! Death to Israel!"

Muslim wife: "It looks like it might rain today."
Muslim husband (shouting): "Death to America! Death to Israel!"

Muslim wife: "Little Abdul got a "D" on his spelling test today."
Muslim husband (shouting): "Death to America! Death to Israel!"

Is this the only response this idiots can muster?
The Pope is a GERMAN who lives in ITALY, for crying out loud.
He is about as American as brachworst or linguini.
So if a Dutch cartoonist makes fun of Mohammed, or the German/Italian Pope points out the contradiction between religious conversion and violence, the Muslim response is the same?

"Death to America!"
"Death to Israel!"

And, by the way, can anyone show me ENNEETHING positive Muslims have contributed to the world in the last 500 years?

(And by the way, I don't hate Muslims. I just think that the reaction of many of them is stupid. As in, irrational, illogical, non-productive, self-defeating, counter-advantagous.)

Come and get me Osama.
I dare you,

Thursday, September 14, 2006

The Following letter was sent today

To
Senator John McCain
Senator Lindsey Graham
Senator John Warner


Gentlemen,

I am disgusted and offended by your opposition to the definition of interrogation rules under the Geneva Convention.

You are obviously more interested in protecting the enemies of our nation than in protecting this nation.

Because of this latest action and your previous statements, actions and votes on initiatives regarding the prosecution of the war on terrorism, I am convinced you are dangerous to this country.

I consider each of you traitors to this nation and I will fully support your prosecution for treason.

Wednesday, September 13, 2006

Signs of the Coming Season

I hate to see this.
Leaves on the ground.
It means that the nice hot weather is soon to end and the cold, grey, windy weather is about to begin. I very dislike winter.
I did not understand this for many years.
And I did not understand why.
But now I know.
See, the days get short in the winter.
Thus, it becomes dark earlier in the "day".
So, at 4:00 PM it is dark and it makes you feel that it is later in the day.
As if you worked overtime and missed all the sunlight, when you really did not.
It is a sykological issue, but it affects many peepul (mee included) this way.
Some peepul even become depressed during winter.
I don't really get depressed.
I just get sleepy and eat a lot of soup. :)

On the subject of leevs, I have a pet peev.

This is the back of my little house.
For sum reeson leaves like to pile up right in front of my back door.
Note that there are no leaves in front of the left glass door which does not open.
Just in front of the right glass door which does open. B-(
Obvioulsy this is a function of some aerodynamic attribute of my door frame or something.
I have yet to figure it out but I shall and build a deflector to cause the leaves to pile somewhere else.

And sum daa soon I will explaan too yoo mii plan for changing the english spelling ruls to a fonetic system.
It will maak spelling so much eezeer.

Thursday, September 07, 2006

Som Tek Nooz

One petaflop.
It sounds like a tropical plant.
Or a skateboard trick.
But that is not what it is.
It is unit of measure for computer performance.
It stands for 1,000 trillion calculations per second, or one petaflop.
That would be 1 quadrillion calculations per second.
That would be fast.

Just so you can have some more data to forget when you need it, after quadrillion, the number names go like this,
Quintrillion
Sextillion
Septillion
Octillion
Nonillion
Decillion
Undecillion
Duodecillion
Tredecillion
Quattuordecillion
Quindecillion
Sexdecillion
Septendecillion
Octodecillion
Novemdecillion
Vigintillion
Googol

Back to the petaflop.
It was announced this week that IBM is going to build a supercomputer that can perform 1.6 petaflops per second on a sustained basis.
Interestingly, the “computer” will be a collection of “off the shelf” rack-mount servers.
The computer(s) will be running Red Hat Linux version 4.3 (sorry Micro$soft), and use 16,000 AMD Opteron processors (sorry Intel).
The computer will use 4,000 IBM System x 3755 systems with 8,000 IBM BladeCenter H system cards with two Cell Broadband Engine CPUs on them.
The Cell Broadband Engine is the new 64-bit 8-core processor chip developed jointly by IBM, Sony, and Toshiba.


Each of the x3755 systems have FOUR Opteron processors in them and can address up to 128 Gb of RAM. (!) They look like this - (liik yoo kaer)

They will doo the switching and breakdown of the complex equations coming into the system.



Each of the BladeCenter H system cards have two Cell B.E. processors in them and can address up to 16Gb of RAM. They lok liik this -











It will be called “Roadrunner” (Meep! Meep!)

Maintain the 180.

Tuesday, September 05, 2006

"Stranger In This House" - (apologies to Ronnie Milsap)

When I tell folks that I live alone, that is only partially true.
As you see, I have "others" who share my humble abode.
Every once in a while they come out to visit me.
I am rather unfriendly to some of them - call it prejudice, profiling - whatever.
I just prefer to not associate with some of my house-mates.
And, I must confess, I am violent at times.
I have killed several of my house-mates and sent their corpses to both the local water treatment facility and the local landfill.
I am sure that the "little" creatures mean no harm and are simply doing what comes naturally to them.
But I, in my prejudice, am not open to discourse with them.
And while I am not really "afraid" of them, I experience a certain revulsion that outweighs my normally docile and friendly nature.
And thus, I attack - irrationally, with no apology, with premeditation and intent to inflict lethal bodily harm.
As evidenced here, I have dispached another individual to the great arthropodial resting place out there.

Saturday, September 02, 2006

A Busy Day

Today started off nicely.
I had my famous Saturday morning breakfast- a three-egg cheese omlette.
Then it was off to Lowe's and Walmart.
Then home again, home again, bliggity blog.
And the Vent from Hell project.

It seemed like a rather simple project at first.
Let me explain:
My microwave oven sits under the cabinet above my stove.
The microwave has a fan in it but it blows out the front above the door.
I found the user manual and read that the fan can be adjusted so that it blows out the top through a vent.
The change was simple.
All that was required was to remove the microwave, take off a cover plate on the top, take out the fan and rotate it 90 degrees, re-install the fan, re-install the cover plate, re-install the microwave, ta da, fan blows out the top.
Simple, right?
Yes, but there is a problem.

For this to work, you have to have a 4 by 10 inch duct that connects to a round 6 inch duct that vents through the roof.
Oh, and the cabinet above my stove has a shelf across the middle and a top against the ceiling.
But I really need a vent above my stove so....
I went to the giant building supply barn and purchased the 4 by 10 flange, a two foot long section of 6 inch diameter duct, and a cap vent for the top.

The user manual included a template for cutting a duct above the unit.
I marked the corners of the 4 by 10 hole on the shelf directly above the microwave.
I was going to drill marker holes at the four corners of the rectangle I had marked.
But there was a problem.

The shelves in the cabinet are so close together that my drill will not fit inside.
So, with the help of my son, I removed the microwave from its location above the stove.
Now, I could drill and cut the 4 by 10 hole from the BOTTOM, guiding the drill and saw by watching where the blade was in relation to the line I had drawn on the TOP of the shelf.
This turned out to be good practice for what was to come.

Once the 4 by 10 hole was cut, I had room to poke my drill up to drill the starter hole for the six-inch diameter hole for the straight duct in the center shelf.
I marked the shelf (on the bottom side this time), drilled the starter hole, then using my jigsaw, cut the round hole.
Well, I cut most of it.
There was a problem.

See, the vent fan is at the very back of the microwave, so the ductwork has to run right next to the wall of the house.
There is not enough room for power tools when you have to make cuts or holes that are closer than about one inch to the wall.
So I had to finish the cuts closest to the wall with a little hand driven coping saw.
A good shoulder workout.

Then came the six-inch cut in the top of the cabinet.
Poking the drill through the hole I had just cut in the middle shelf, I made the starter hole in the top of the cabinet.
Then using the jigsaw I cut as much of the hole as I could (about 80 percent).
As I expected, when I cut the hole in the cabinet, I cut through the sheet rock ceiling.

Not a problem.
This was what I expected.
Now I could see up into the attic.
My hole was right next to a ceiling joist.
Between the joist and my hole were three big wires.
I had almost cut through my house wires.
But I didn’t. (Hand wipes across forehead)
This left the last step(s) – drilling through the roof.
I put this portion of the project off to another day.

So, today, I caught myself sitting at my computer trying to think of something to do on it when I realized that I was procrastinating.
I did not want to tackle the last part of the duct project.
I laughed as I realized that I was afraid of what I would get into.
And when you start drilling holes in your roof you have to stay with the project until the hole is covered/fixed/completed.
I mentally grabbed myself by the hair and pulled myself out of the chair.
“It will probably only take an hour or so,” I said as I walked toward the kitchen.
That was at 9:30 AM.

It is now 3:03 PM.
I have just finished cleaning up the mess, changed clothes and treated myself to a nice, cold root beer.
I deserved it.
This project was Murphy cubed.
Have I ever told you that I would rather build something new from scratch than attempt to change something in a house already built.
I have again been reminded why.

To mark the hole to be cut in the roof, I ran my level up through the hole in the ceiling until it touched the plywood decking of the roof.
By holding the level exactly vertical (end bubble centered), this would allow me to mark the slanted roof in line with the holes already cut in the cabinet.
But there was a problem.

I could not see anything in the dark attic through the six-inch hole in the ceiling/cabinet.
So I went and got my small hand mirror and flashlight.
By setting the mirror at a 45 degree angle against the wall and shining the flashlight at the mirror, the mirror reflected the light up into the attic and reflected the now illuminated image down to me.
So now, by looking in the mirror, holding the level in one hand and my Sharpie in the other, I marked four points on my six-inch soon-to-be hole on the roof decking.

Then, using the mirror and flashlight as before, I poked the drill up into the attic and drilled a hole at each of the four marks.
Try drilling a hole using a mirror sometime.
It is like driving an Etch-a-Sketch with boxing gloves on.
But there was a problem.

I did not see any daylight through any of the holes.
This was not good.
I knew that the previous owner had build on a large addition across the back of the house.
This addition had a shed-type roof nailed to the existing roof.
My fear was that the vent duct was located so far to the rear of the existing house that the add-on roof covered it.
I would have to cut through two roofs.
Hello Murphy.
And there was another problem.

The space between the ceiling and the roof was just the right distance that I could not get my drill into the attic.
I would have to cut through both roofs from the top.
The good news was that I would have plenty of room to work from the top.
The bad news was, I was not sure where to make my hole.

I rechecked my measurement of the location of the existing hole then went up on the roof.
I measured and began digging through the shingles.
But there was a problem.

After I had cut through two layers of shingles, there was another layer.
And another,
And another.
Yep, FIVE layers of shingles – two white, one black, one blue, and one brown tweed.
Oh, and a layer of tar paper on the bottom.
Then I hit wood.

I drilled a small hole and peeked in – more shingles.
Just like I thought.
I enlarged my hole to about three inches to see if I could see the holes I had drilled from the bottom.
But there was a problem.

Right in the middle of where my six-inch hole should be was a DOUBLE rafter of the add-on roof.
Two two-by-whatevers side by side.
I had missed the joist in the attic, but I bullseyed the rafter of the addition.
I was sure I could hear Murphy chuckling.

The good news was that I was near were the new roof met the old roof so the rafters here were cut on a long taper.
At this point they were only about three inches thick.
After some cutting, I removed a six-inch section of the two rafters.
And there, where the rafters had been, were two of the four holes I had drilled from the inside.
Bingo!
I was dead on target.
After a little more searching, I found the other two holes.
This was gratifying.

I began removing shingles from the “lower” roof.
But there was a problem.

After I had cut through two layers of shingles, there was another layer.
And another.
And another.
And another.
And another.
Yep, SEVEN layers of shingles – four white, one black, one blue, and one brown tweed.
Oh, and a layer of tar paper on the bottom.
Then I hit wood - again.

If you are keeping score, that makes 12 layers of shingles on my house.
At least in this one area.
No wonder I cannot hear the rain on the roof.
This means that in the 43 years since this house was built, the owners re-roofed it an average of every three-and-a-half years.
They must have had a shingle fetish.

BTW, the best tool for cutting through the shingles – which are notorious for ruining cutting tools (I ruined a nice 3/8 drill bit on this project) – was my putty knife.
Yep, just press the corner firmly into the shingle along the line where you want the cut and up they come.
No slips, no cuts, no dull tools.

I was now ready to cut the hole in the roof to the proper size to match the holes in the cabinet and ceiling.
But there was a problem.

The second (lower)(original) roof was so far below the level of the first (upper) (added-on) roof, that none of my power saws would reach it.
So I took my trusty drill and drilled 87 holes (more or less) in a nice six-inch circle (more or less), took my trusty hammer and assisted the center section in escaping the confines of roofhood.
I had a hole in the roof.

Now I could look down into my house and see a series of three six-inch holes and one hole, four inches by ten inches, all stacked one above the other.
I took my two-foot section of six-inch duct and attempted to insert it into my collection of holes.
But there was a problem.

It fidn’t dit.
The hole in the roof(s) was too small and about two inches off from the others.
Murphy! Hush!
So I cut some more upper shingles, cut some more upper deck wood, cut more off the upper rafters, cut some more lower shingles, drilled some more holes in the lower deck wood, removed some more wood, and - KACHING!
The vent duct fit.
I was very happily ever after.

I inserted the vent sections into the holes.
Then, I attempted to slide the roof boot over the protruding duct.
There was a problem.

The vent boot was too small for the duct.
So I took my trusty airline hijacking tool (box cutter) and cut out a section of the boot to match the size of my duct. (the boot is plastic)
Now the boot fit.
I slid it into place.

I slid the rain cap onto the protruding duct and – ta-da – it was done – almost.
Just a few more things to do.

I gathered up my tools – which were many (drill, jig saw, skill saw, box cutter, putty knife, hand saw , hammer and tape measure), and climbed down my ladder to terra firma.
I apprehended my trusty caulking gun and trusty silicone caulk and up my trusty ladder I went.
After spreading toxic goop around my vent pipe, I went down the ladder with the caulk/caulking gun and came up with my big push-broom.
I brushed all the shingles, wood, splinters, nails, and whatever off the roof, took one last admiring look at my handiwork and descended that ladder for the last time.

I swept up the leftovers and deposited them in the trash bin.
Then back in the kitchen, I used my handy stand up vacuum cleaner as a shop vac and sucked up all the dust, insulation, wood chips, etc, that had fallen through my new hole(s).

I was/am tery vired.
Hence, the sitting and the root beer (which is now gone).

Wednesday, August 30, 2006

TAXES ON BUSINESS – PART 3 (I think)

If you recall from my previous rantings, I said that businesses pay for all of their expenses by the money they get from their customers.
This is not a crime, just the way things **are**.

All of the costs of doing business – no matter what business a company might be in – are paid for by the people or other companies that buy the products of that company.
These costs include raw materials, wages, utilities, paper, pencils, rent – whatever.
In addition to the costs that I just listed, there other items like federal, state and local taxes.
I pointed this out in a preevious post.

It also includes health insurance for the employees.
Did it ever occur to you that you are paying for the health insurance of the workers of the companies that you buy products from?
Well, yoo doo.
Eevin if yoo doo not hav health insurance yurself.

BTW – understand the concept of “insurance”.
Basically, people buy – as in PAY for - a “service” that they do not need and hope they never need.
Thus, the customers who do not need the service pay for the costs incurred by those customers who actually do need/use the service.
Does this sound stupid to yoo?
Just thought I would ask.
Weird as it is – it woiks.

And this leeds mee tu a pet peev of miin.....

I think that companies should get out of the business of providing health insurance for employees.
“WHAT?” yoo sa. “How will I get any health insurance?”
Here’s how – you will shop for it just like yoo doo a car or beans.
Or like you shop for insurance for your car or house.
You will compare features/benefits against the cost of the policies offered by various companies.

To offset the loss of this benefit, companies will have to increase wages a bit.
But the increase will not have to equal the cost of the insurance they no longer provide.
Why?
Because the cost of health insurance will decrease when you introduce competition into the market.

Insurance companies are in business to make money.
DUH!
Again, not a crime.

They set their rates based on actual costs of people using their services (claims) and whatever profit margin they want to tack on top of their costs.
They justify their prices by saying that certain “populations” (groups of people) have higher or lower total claim costs than other populations.
Technically this is true.
But they never show you these figures so you can make a judgement for yourself.

Usually, the insurance companies give better (lower) rates (per policy) to bigger companies and charge more (per policy) to smaller companies.
Question: what does the size of a company have to do with the general overall health of its employees?
Or the amount of insurance claims they make?
This correct answer is: NOTHING!
This is just a way of jacking up the price of insurance coverage.

If you really wanted to tailor the cost of health insurance to actual expected claims, you would segregate all smokers, drinkers, dopeheads, and fat people from the rest of the population.
(about 70% of the population)
These people would pay the highest premiums because they are the most likely to have health problems.
No matter what size company they work for.
Then you would isolate all runners, walkers, weight lifters, aerobicists, and anybody with a bodyfat reading of 20% or less.
(about 10% of the population)
These people would pay the lowest health insurance premiums because they are the least likely to have a health claim.
Those remaining would pay a health insurance premium somewhere in between the previous two.

This is what the insurance companies do for auto and homeowners insurance.
You would only have to pay for the coverage you wanted/needed.

By having all of us shopping for health insurance, the insurance companies would reduce policy prices to get your business from their competitors.
The insurance companies would put pressure on hospitals and doctors to control costs.
Hospitals and doctors who did not provide the lowest cost services would be dropped by certain insurers, putting pressure on them to become more efficient.
The days of the ten dollar Band-Aid would be over.
The same pressure would be put on drug manufacturers causing a similar reaction.

The operation of the free market always lowers costs (in the long run), makes businesses more effecient and benefits the consumer.

Class dismissed.

Maintain the 180.

Monday, August 28, 2006

THE MESSAGE SUNDAY

The message Sunday was interesting.

It was taken from the following passage in John 17.

I have highlighted the phrases that he used to point out the items of emphasis.

20“I do not pray for these alone, but also for those who £will believe in Me through their word;

21that they all may be one, as You, Father, are in Me, and I in You; that they also may be one in Us, that the world may believe that You sent Me.

22And the glory which You gave Me I have given them, that they may be one just as We are one:

23I in them, and You in Me; that they may be made perfect in one, and that the world may know that You have sent Me, and have loved them as You have loved Me.

24“Father, I desire that they also whom You gave Me may be with Me where I am, that they may behold My glory which You have given Me; for You loved Me before the foundation of the world.

25O righteous Father! The world has not known You, but I have known You; and these have known that You sent Me.

26And I have declared to them Your name, and will declare it, that the love with which You loved Me may be in them, and I in them.”


The points:
1 Jesus desired that his followers be in unity ("one"). (v. 21, 22, 23)
2 God gave a "glory" to Jesus that he, in turn, passed on the the disciples (v.22).
3 This "glory" was for the purpose of unity. (v. 22)
4 This "glory" would make each of them complete ("perfect") - telio-o (Gr. - to accomplish a goal) in unity ("one"). (v. 23)
5 This finished unity would be visible because other people ("the world") would see it. (v. 23)
6 By seeing this unity, other people would know the God sent Jesus. (v. 23)
7 By seeing this unity, other people would know that God loves Jesus in the same way that he loves each of his followers. (v. 23)
8 Jesus desired that all of his followers be with him. (v. 24)
9 By being with Jesus, all of his followers will see the glory that God gave to him. (v. 24)
10 God gave this glory to Jesus because He loved him. (v. 24)
11 The people of the world do not know God. (v.25)
12 Jesus knows God. (v. 25)
13 The followers of Jesus know that God sent Jesus. (v. 25)
14 Jesus explained the nature of God ("your name") to the disciples. (v. 26)
15 By explaining the nature of God, the love which God gave to Jesus would be in each of the disciples. (v. 26)
16 By explaining the nature of God, Jesus would be in the disciples. (v. 26)

Tuesday, August 22, 2006

ECONOMICS 201 – TAXES

You may hear/read about this concept from time to time.
This being an election year, if you haven’t heard it yet – yoo will.

A popular liberal hobby horse is modification of the tax code.
Specifically, the liberals want to increase the tax RATE of those who have high income to pay for the extra services the government provides to those who have low income.

This impulse comes directly from Karl Marx, the author of communism.
Doo yoo see the word “common” in there?
It is a clue.
But I digress.

The all-too-common rhetoric is phrased as “tax the rich to help the poor”, or some such drivel.
So lets look at how many folks be “rich” and how many be po.
This will help us see who pays and who gets.

First, lets decide how much income qualifies you as “rich”.

Let’s look at the records from the IRS for some information.
The latest verified statistics from the IRS on individual tax returns are from 2003.

Would you say that any person or family that had an annual Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) of $100,000 or more would be considered “rich”?
Okay, here is how the numbers roll:

Total number of persons/families with AGI of $100,000 or more = 11,491,829.
This represents 8.74% of all individual federal tax returns.
These eleven million plus people paid 59.468% of the total federal income taxes.
This leaves 91.25% of all taxpayers to pay the other 40.53%.
Just to recap – 8.7 percent of all taxpayers pay almost 60 percent of all individual income taxes.

But, yoo say, an annual income of $100,000 is not enough to qualify a person/family as “rich”.
So let’s jack up our cutoff point to $200,000 per year.

Total number of persons/families with AGI of $200,000 or more = 2,609,461.
This represents 1.987% of all individual federal tax returns.
These two million plus people paid 21.678% of the total federal income taxes.
This leaves 98.01% of all taxpayers to pay the other 78.322%.
Just to recap – 1.98 percent of all taxpayers pay 21 percent of all individual income taxes.

As yoo kan see, the “rich” ALREADY pay a large percentage of federal income taxes.

Here is my worry – I do not know were the liberals are going to draw the line between “rich” and “poor”.
It is almost certain they will not draw it as high as I did here.
Why?
Because they cannot raise the tax rate enough on just these eleven million (or less) households to get enough additional money to pay for all the programs they want to finance.
The rest of the money will have to come from yoo and mee.

And remember, income taxes on businesses are already paid by yoo and mee.

Do not be fooled by talk about tax the “rich”.
It is a lie.
If you have an income – U R rich.

That sucking sound you hear is the federal vacuum hose nosing around your wallet.

ON BEING A JANITOR

April 15 th of 2013 was my last year to work for HR Block. I disliked the corporate pressure to make us call customers to try to sel...